|
commentary by
Michael L. Bromley |
Bromleyisms
... of Automobiles
... and Politics
...and of history, of society, and a whole lot more.
| he, he... |
|
Pages: More entries: see index
|
... of Automobiles
and...
I suppose the corollary to not fixing what ain't broke would be to break what's not fixed. In the case of the Ford Thunderbird (a creation of Ralph Nader? see this Graphic of the Week) there's more than just a little reason for abandonment. Judge and jury would understand. Really. But all of Buick, too? At GM the question isn't which brand to drop, but which one to keep. They ought to wrap all the SUVs into one logo, GM BIG, and, with the exception of Cadillac and the Chevrolet Corvette (perhaps under the logo, GM Still Breathing), all the larger passenger cars into another, GM Dead, Then, they should throw all the imports and fake-cars into GM Made in Korea. That would mean, of course, admitting that Saturn ought really be made in Korea. It'll happen on its own, regardless. The real question here is what would it take to revive Buick or Pontiac -- or, even, dig up Oldsmobile. It's a goddamn shame they let Olds sink, for it merely suffered on behalf of Buick and Pontiac. Who could tell the difference between any of them, anyway? Sure, Buick has been distinguishing itself of late, but who's noticed? The only reason Ford hasn't dropped Ford is because that's all it's got. Mercury? Lincoln? They might as well be Buick or Pontiac. It's gonna be a long road back for Detroit. Here for the great automotive observer, Jerry Flint of Forbes on this: GM: It's Worse Than You Thought. I think I should be sad. I'm just not sure I am. Here for previous entry |
|||