commentary by Michael L. Bromley
copyright 2005

Bromleyisms

... of Automobiles
... and Politics

...and of history, of society, and a whole lot more.

he, he...

 


 

 
Pages:
 
Main
News
Publications
Bromleyisms...                     
...of automobiles
...and politics
...2003/2004 blogs
...1999-2001
Taft Book
Taft Pages
Limo Book
Limo Pages
Graphic of the Week
Reading List & Book Reviews
Automotive
Book Reviews
Parking Jobs
Links
Contact

More entries: see Index

 

... of Politics

May 10/06: May Day! May Day! (Migra! Migra!)

Uh, oh, things didn't work out so good for the "day without immigrants." Sorry, did you not notice? Neither did much anyone else, including a -- get this -- San Francisco Chronicle columnist:

The 'Day Without Immigrants' Backfires
With last month's barrage of anti-immigration-enforcement protests, Americans had their fill of the issue. The sea of Mexican and Latin American flags, the scuffles in schools and other public buildings over the raising of Mexican flags, all the "reconquista" and "stolen land" rhetoric and the sight of thousands of illegal immigrants demanding citizenship had done little to gain supporters.

So when organizers insisted on continuing the offensive with a nationwide boycott aimed at crippling the nation's economy on May 1, it was a political disaster waiting to happen. Immigrants (legal or otherwise) were urged to boycott work, school and commerce and go out and demonstrate instead.

This time around, organizers had obviously spoken to participants about the Mexican flags, because American flags were now the order of the day. Never mind that organizers could be seen in television footage quietly replacing Mexican flags with American ones. All of a sudden we were to believe that patriotism was back in style. Needless to say, the subterfuge did not succeed.

As for the boycott itself, the much-ballyhooed "Day Without Immigrants" came and went, and the country is still standing.

Remember this brave columnist's name: Cinnamon Stillwell. Something's right with the world if the SF Chronicle publishes a voice such as this:

Holding the boycott on May Day, an international workers holiday with communist connotations, didn't help. While much of Latin America celebrates May Day, most Americans aren't particularly fond of anything associated with communism. But despite its failure in practice and the attendant body count, communism is still being touted by the American far left. And it was they, among other special-interest groups, who organized the "Day Without Immigrants" boycott and last month's protests.

International A.N.S.W.E.R. (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism), a group that, in its own words, wants to "transform society, disarm the Pentagon and win back all that has been stolen from us -- from Los Angeles to Baghdad, Mexico City to Manila, Port au Prince to Gaza and everywhere," was one of the main organizers. This fact was overlooked by most of the mainstream media protest coverage, despite the wealth of signs carrying the group's logo. Such coverage almost uniformly omitted the word "illegal" as well.

We've dealt with here with ANSWER and its sponsor, Ramsey Clark well enough. Fools all, grabbing air, and catching nothing.

But what of the honest illegal who wanted to make the point that we couldn't live without 'em on May 1? Sorry, amigos, but we didn't notice. As Stillwell points out, it was Hispanic-owned businesses that suffered the boycott not the rest of us. The fact is, while the grass may have grown an extra quarter-inch that day, legal briefs were filed, computer code was written, laws were passed, and stocks were bought and sold -- all without delay or interruption.

The day off proved only that the immigrants -- legal and not -- need us more than we need them.

She's not there as a worn-out welcoming mat -- or a distress sign. She's a gift, not a right. She's a sign of hope, not despair. They abused her on May 1, and it didn't fly.

Her flame shines bright with or without 'em. It's up to them
 


Here for previous entry
More entries: see index